On Friday, March 13, I spent the day working looking for jobs. Bookbuyers called and canceled our appointment, explaining that they could not hire anyone because of financial reasons which makes sense. They said nothing personal, that they enjoyed my resume and cover letter and would consider me in future if any jobs came up. Of course, I told them please do. This made me somewhat happy because I got such a quick call back and because my cover letter and resume were useful, even though I am disappointed they couldn’t use me.
Saturday I went to the booksale and bought some things. One book tells how to cook jicama, which I’ve tried unsuccessful in the past. But that book has microwave instructions and I haven’t tried that, only in stews.
Somewhere in this week, possibly Saturday, because I know I was coming back from somewhere at it was likely the booksale, I met the neighbors who asked me to dinner Of course the scientist wanted to do science experiments, but as it was shabbat, we couldn’t. We settled at last on making a paper plate water wheel, which I could do and not break shabbat for them, and I made an extremely uneven water wheel with a pencil. I didn’t measure the cuts, so naturally between the friction from the uneven hole and the uneven slats, the wheel would only turn about halfway under the kitchen faucet. All the children and their mother gathered to see it turn.
Afterwards, when it was 9 PM and time for me to be home vegging, the scientist ran about the house with a carefully cut off section of double-sided suction cup and a soda can. He cut the sides off so that it would stick in odd places where a normal suction cup wouldn;t, which was a good idea. I was worried that the suction cup wouldn’t have enough suction this way. I duct taped it to the soda can, and the scientist ran around attaching it to glass in picture frames, windows, and cabinets in general, while his father watched looking rather bewhildered. The soda can bounced off several times. I noticed that the scientist has now somewhat understands that the suction cup can only be attached firmly to things like windows, which is different from earlier. (Although he still wanted to attach to textured walls). At last I said I needed to go home and explained that I would do science another day when it wasn’t shabbat.
On Sunday around 8 PM, after I had stopped my job searching for the day, here was the scientist and his mother, wanting me to come over for science education. We had decided on several exhibits on shabbat, and found the one about pendulums, which I copied. Meanwhile the scientist wanted to know if I had made my cookie tin banjo and how, and whether I could get the singing toy pig dancing on the piano.
I took the banjo over, returning with it soon after, as everyone wanted to play with it and tune the strings, which meant that it was rapidly getting to a state where I would have to retune, such as it was, so I took it home. I had collected the awful, wonderfully looking knitting string from our house, which turned out to stretch and break. I neglected to follow instructions, though the scientist reminded me several times. Of course, the instructions called for stabbing a ball with a knitting needle, something I can’t safely attempt without injuring me, someone else or throwing the needle.
Instead, I bound the 4 pens together with duct tape. We debated suspending them from the ceiling as instructed by the project, but give this up as the tape would pull all the paint off the ceiling.
Instead, I tied it to the chandeliar. The scientist had the job of cutting any duct tape, finding a large ball to try and weight the pendulum. We taped this to the top, which prompted sent the microphone shaped pendulum into sideways spins.
In between attempts to fix the pendulum, the scientist practiced singing into the microphone.
I found something interesting awhile back with the baking soda experiment. The scientist’s speculation of why couldn’t you just leave the shell in plain water, is, in fact, technically correct. If you left one shell in water and the other in vinegar, you would have a control and an experimental shell. Now I doubt the scientist thought of the two together like that, other than wondering why you get the same effect with water, but those are the right questions to be asking. It’s good to have questions like this, I said then. It’s interesting to watch a 6 or 7 year old thinking about how stuff works.
The pendulum eventually swayed erratically back and forth, propelled only by frequent shoves from the scientist, and only drew when pressed down quite hard.
“Look,” the scientist said, pointing to stock market lines, “we drew on the paper.”
Well, the pendulum was somewhat successful. It did swing, held upright by two strings (to stabilize it from going sideways) and duct taped at odd angles. It didn’t draw nice circles as I wanted, and it didn’t complete any circle under its own power, but it did provide entertainment.
The scientist said he would like to do science all the time.
I’d been cooking quinces on the stove because al the pans were dirty and I found apparently that high boiling the stuff for 3 hours is not the same as in the rock pot for 3 hours, or the oven for 8 hours. Finally, I ate a small piece, although it wasn’t red and done yet. Then of course I thought of all the awful things that could happen to you if you swallowed one raw, though I suppose unripe persimmons are the same way, inedible
Then of course I left them and didn’t notice them again until they burnt spectacularly all over the pan.
Today (March 15), I basically did the dishes, watered the sprouting crops in the back room (tomatoes) and watered the outside garden. I figured out the other day how to tap the worm tea in the worm bin, so I’ve been watering with that and the leftover rain water that completely filled one of the large containers by the garden. That way it won’t become home to mosquitoes and I won’t have to fight with the hose for awhile.
Then I went and caught the train. Several people were grabbing hold of the poles and turning gymnast somersaults with them, which I’ve never seen anyone try to do on the train. They were apparently quite practiced at it.
This kind of thing drives me nuts. In between, naturally, they were shrieking, which is another thing that drives me nuts. I brought Temple Grandin’s book Animals in Translation and I tried very hard to concentrate on that.
The part about visualization and your brain is extremely interesting, mainly because I’ve been thinking about this lately. I have difficulty with proprioperception, where your body is in space. In fact, I’ve been knocking knees, elbows and in general walking into doors quite regularly lately.
So it doesn’t surprise me that I also have problems seeing myself in dreams, or imagining my lungs in my head. I’ve seen drawings of lungs and actual lungs, so picturing a lung in my head should be absolutely no problem. But it is. The odd thing is that I can imagine detailed fictional environments for stories with no difficulty. It makes me wonder if visualizing yourself and visualization in general are located in the same area of the brain. Interesting concept. I’ll have to look it up. Then, again, maybe it’s linked to proprioperception or faulty nerve connections or something.
I worked on job searching a little after I got to the apartment, then worked on this blog. However, due to the wrong time on the clock I missed the TV show I wanted to watch. I discovered the stoves had been on trying to hard boil eggs since at least Tuesday, so I turned that off and threw out the eggs. I’ve also forgotten hot water in the microwave twice now. Only good thing is at least I only have hot plates. I made a pizza for dinner, remembering the first 10 minutes to find it hadn’t defrosted, then popping it back in the oven to burn to a crisp. The timer on the oven doesn’t beep when it’s through, and apparently if I’m not paying attention I don’t notice burning until it’s very burnt. Means I’ll have to pay a lot more attention to what I’m cooking.
Anyway, back to the Holocaust movies I’ve been watching. The intriguing thing about all of them is perspective. The first two, Island on Bird Street and Look to the Sky are somewhat autobiographical. The last, The Boy in the Striped Pajamas is fiction. All of them involve narrators aged 3 or 4, or at most 11, all are set in the Holocaust and in most of them the audience knows more about the Holocaust situation than the narrators, who are trying to adapt.
In Island on Bird Street, a boy reads Robinson Crusoe and sees his hiding place in a ghetto as an adventure. (How do I get food, shelter, etc?). He doesn’t know where his father went.
In Look to the Sky, a boy travels with his mother to a concentration camp. When they’re first taken away from home, he refuses to leave without his tricycle and rushes back to get it. He doesn’t see this move as dangerous because he’s something like 3 or 4 at the time. When he’s 8 or so, friends at the concentration camp dare him to make gestures at guards and visit the “monastry” where the dead are kept. [All dares I would never expect to see in a camp because I didn’t know there was enough free time for children to act like children]. His mother’s perspective is that he could be killed, or pick up typhoid or other disease from the “monastry,” but although he’s panic stricken about being locked in the monastry itself, he relates what he did matter-of-factly (I completed the dare. The people were dead and this is normal]. This is a book I’ll have to look up.
In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, the perspective is really there in front of the audience. In the movie, you see only what the boy sees and hear only what he hears. His dad is a soldier. And there are these funny people next to the house that wear striped pajamas all day and work on a farm. [It’s interesting to look at the time differences in this movie. The boy and his friends run around in the middle of town pretending to be airplanes. If you were nine years old today and tried that, people would stare at you. It’s like when I watched I know my First Name is Steven on TV. The first thought in my head was what is a seven year old doing walking home alone. It wouldn’t happen today. When I’ve read comments about the movie Changeling, someone said well, the mother left her kid home alone for the day and he’s nine, so naturally he got kidnapped. By nine today you might be able to stay by yourself but I don’t think people in the 1930’s saw this the same way we do today. Folks in factories were leaving their 6 year olds in charge during the same time period. And also if people wore striped pajamas like in Goodnight Mister Tom regualrly in the 1940’s, you could interpret clothing this way. But today pajamas aren’t traditionaly striped like this and a modern interpretation would be different]. Anyway, some parts of this movie would only be possible if you didn’t notice current events (and it seems like if you were playing airplanes, you probably wouldn’t care much what was going on in town), and also if your parents never brought their work home with them. Since you don’t hear the parents in the movie saying “no way will that kid join the Hitler Youth or salute, etc.” it makes you wonder. However, things like this seem to be delibrately missing, so that the perspective is kept (of course Dad always does the right thing since he’s dad). The ending was surprising, but exactly opposite of what you would expect. The only problem is, the parents wouldn’t feel guilty for the reasons a person today would expect. You might say “Why, didn’t I watch him more closely?” but I don’t think you would say, “My child is a child like these folks over here, and therefore we shouldn’t have…”
I got the book at the library and it’s as if Dr. Seuss and A.A. Milne got togehter to write a book about the Holocaust. I mean that respectfully. The book is labeled a fable, and it’s written like one. It does a lot of the same things the Winnie the Pooh books do (misunderstanding words, repetition of phrases, capitalizing Very Important Words). For that, it’s an enjoyable book to read.
In contrast, the last History Club movie we watched was also about the Holocaust, this time with teenagers who liked big band music and passively disobeyed the Nazis by playing it. The part that supposed to shock the viewer didn’t work for me. What did is the scene where one of the characters says something like, all right, I’ll go and join the retards and the cripples that’s where I belong.
That struck me.
Why?
Because if the film is set in the 1930’s-1940’s, I would bet that unless it was long before the concentration camps opened, there really weren’t all that many “cripples and retards” left. They were the test subjects for the first gas chambers, from different institutions, if I remember correctly. I don’t know how many there were, but the T-4 program was what allowed the death camps to exist in the first place. That character’s quote is a chilling statement, and one that doesn’t seem to be quoted anywhere that I can find. What stands out for me is the film has good music, seems a little lopsided somehow, and has this remarkable statement that’s been overlooked.
Anyway, there’s my movie reviews for the day.